Taxing Tuesday: SALT cap zero! Great new taste!
by meep
Okay, it’s me arguing for SALT cap zero. I haven’t seen others promoting the idea, but it’s probably they’re like me: somebody who can be pure on tax ideology because nobody is paying me for this one way or another.
Also, I don’t have to try to get elected or help people get elected.
So it’s easy for me.
While I have you here, I’ve also got some ideas for public pensions…..
Okay, that’s for another time.
TESTIMONY FROM THE TAX FOUNDATION
I got an email from the Tax Foundation, one of my favorite sources for tax stats.
They linked to the Testimony before the House Ways and Means Select Revenue Measures Subcommittee, but that’s quite long and they had a nice summary in their mass email. So let me quote the email:
Here’s a few highlights from her testimony:
1. Most Americans got a tax cut as a result of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA). The law lowered tax rates, expanded the standard deduction and child tax credit, and limited the AMT and several notable deductions, including the SALT deduction.
2. The SALT cap mainly impacts high-income individuals. Limiting the SALT deduction helped finance broad tax reform and maintain progressivity within the tax code. Prior to tax reform, more than 90 percent of the benefits of the SALT deduction accrued to those with income above $100,000.
3. Even those impacted by the SALT cap often saw a net tax decrease:
- They often were previously impacted by implicit SALT limitations, such as the AMT and the Pease limitation, which were repealed by the TCJA.
- Some quit itemizing their deductions, switching to the expanded standard deduction.
- Many also benefit from lower rates and the expanded child tax credit
I have gotten hit by the AMT before. It’s not fun.
My income is well over $100K. Yes, my SALT went well over $10K. I was able to go over that on property taxes alone.
Because I had other income changes, it’s tough for me to compare year over year but my effective tax rate did go down.
Back to the testimony:
5. The impact of the SALT deduction cap on state budgets is overstated. States saw an increase in revenue from tax reform, due to their conformity to the federal tax code. State and local governments have also explored and passed tax increases since the passage of the new SALT cap.
I asked some other people about that, and they reminded there was a change in the definition in taxable income on the federal level, and since states often take that as a starting point, at the least, they saw taxes revenue increase.
Here is a chart showing how much the SALT deductions were in 2017 vs 2018… and who got those deductions:
Anyway, SALT cap zero! All the way!
TESTIMONY FROM THE OPPOSITION
Rep. Sherrill Urges Passage of Her Bipartisan SALT Bill at Ways & Means Committee Hearing
PARSIPPANY — Representative Mikie Sherrill (NJ-11) appeared in front of the Committee on Ways and Means’ Subcommittee on Select Revenue to urge passage of her bipartisan SALT Relief and Marriage Penalty Elimination Act, H.R. 2624. Representative Sherrill’s bill is co-sponsored by Representatives Elise Stefanik (R-NY), Peter King (R-NY), and Gil Cisneros (D-CA), and endorsed by the American Federation of Teachers and National Association of Realtors.
Full text below:
Thank you, Chairman Thompson, Ranking Member Smith, and Members of the Committee for the opportunity to testify today.…..
I understand why my constituents do not feel Washington is working for them. The SALT cap is simply taking money out of the pockets of New Jerseyans and rewarding mostly-wealthy residents in states that don’t share our commitment to invest in quality schools and public services.What’s more, the SALT tax cap is an active threat to penalize any state or local government that decides to invest in its future. That is why New Jersey and three other states are challenging it in federal court.<
This administration, unfortunately, is arguing that the SALT cap is not a “gun to the head” of states. That may be true. But, as a federal judge pointed out in a hearing just last week,” …it’s a rope to the neck with a gradual squeezing over time.”
Sounds great to me. It’s not the federal government’s fault that New Jersey is a profligate. (No, it’s not an “investment”. It’s expenditures)
It’s not other states’ issue that New Jersey, New York, et. al. want to be high tax paradises. Why should they have to make up for the other states? Tax what you want in New Jersey… but don’t drag the federal government into it.
SALT cap zero!
I want to highlight that the American Federation of Teachers that is endorsing this. We all understand why the Realtors would — they don’t want to have real estate sales slashed due to the property taxes. When there was no SALT cap, people knew property tax would get recognized in determining taxable income for federal income taxes.
But why the teachers? Let’s check that out below.
INTERLUDE: A LICENSE PLATE
Thanks to a friend for sharing that. (not his plate)
TEACHERS AND TAXES
Are You Curious Why New Jersey’s Taxes Are So High?
Not really, but I live in New York.
Okay, let’s see what they have to say:
For the last six weeks, the Sunlight Policy Center of New Jersey has been releasing a series of thoroughly researched and well-sourced reports chronicling the profound impact the NJEA [New Jersey public school teachers’ union] has had on New Jersey’s political system and the long-term consequences for the state and its citizens. While we have presented many salient facts, we think this quote from Executive Director Richardson is very revealing.
…..
FACT #1 – New Jersey is already a very high tax state. According to the Tax Foundation, New Jersey has the worst overall tax climate in the nation – for the fifth straight year. Likewise, Wallethub found that New Jersey citizens have the highest property taxes and total tax burden in America ($11,119).FACT #2 – Since 1992, the cumulative toll of tax hikes on New Jersey citizens have been massive. Total property, income, and sales taxes have increased from $12.97 billion to $37.48 billion, or 288 percent.
FACT # 3 – The NJEA has used its unmatched political clout to push for more state taxes. It was a driving force behind the introduction of the first state sales tax in 1966 and the first state income tax in 1976, as well as every major tax increase since then. Today, our governor appears in NJEA-funded ads calling for an expanded “millionaires’ tax.”
The facts also show that the NJEA helped structure a system that inexorably drove up local property taxes, and when property taxpayers revolted, it turned to state taxes to alleviate the burden. Yet the state budget is in perennial, structural deficit. Competing demands – such as underfunded pensions and exceptionally generous retiree health benefits, (both of which the NJEA helped to bring about), among others – squeeze the budget. The NJEA’s solution over the decades: raising state taxes.
When New Jersey’s most powerful political force pushes for higher taxes for decades, New Jersey predictably becomes one of the highest-tax states in America.
…Oh and by the way, the reason the NJEA has not been refuting our reports, and will not refute this one, is that they are based on actual facts, all sourced and footnoted. It’s hard to deny the truth.
Also, since they do explicitly argue for higher taxes. I don’t see why they would contradict that. They want more money in salaries, and they want to make sure their pensions get paid.
What’s interesting, though, for all that New Jersey is such a high-tax state, it has one of the worst-funded teachers pension fund in the country.
I don’t know why the NJEA think the pensions will actually get fully paid. The law can’t make money that was pissed away on current salaries to appear decades later for the pensions. Perhaps a percentage of that money should have been salted away, eh?
But that’s for another time.
TAX STORIES
- Illinois Review: HOW DID YOUR ILLINOIS STATE REP VOTE ON THE GAS TAX HIKE?
- Lohud: Gov. Cuomo signs Westchester sales tax hike to go into effect on Aug. 1
- Wirepoints: Expect anger at the pump as Illinoisans start paying nation’s 3rd-highest gas tax – Wirepoints Original
- Tax Foundation: 2020 Campaign Tax Proposals
- Tax Foundation: Millionaires’ Tax Take Two: Massachusetts legislature moves forward Millionaires’ Tax
- The Guardian: The woman jailed for a £4,742 council tax debt she could not pay
- WSJ: Manhattan Buyers Rush to Beat New Mansion Tax
- Chicago Sun-Times: Lightfoot turns to service tax after Pritzker rules out state takeover of city pension funds
- Newsbusters: CBS Touts Blue States and Cities Passing New Taxes, Plastic Bag/Straw Bans — is anybody actually excited about this?
- TaxProf Blog: IRS Issues Guidance On New 1.4% Tax On Net Investment Income Of 40 Wealthy Colleges And Universities
- Crain’s Chicago: The best name for Pritzker’s tax push: The Blank Check Amendment
- Cook County Record: Court battle could decide how Illinois governments can spend gas tax money
- National Review: New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy Abandons the ‘Millionaires Tax’
- The Verge: AMERICA NEEDS TO SEE AMAZON’S TAX RETURNS
- CNBC: Tying the knot? Some couples may face a ‘marriage tax penalty’ (note: not really news..it’s been like this for decades)
- WSJ: You Filed Returns. The IRS Compiled the Data. Here’s How the New Tax Law Is Working.
I’m not going to quote the last one, but here’s the gist: high-income folks like me didn’t get much of a refund due to where we live, and fewer of us got hit with the Alternative Minimum Tax. Fewer itemized deductions.
In short, what was expected.
TAX TWEETS
Congratulations to legislators in New Jersey for not passing taxes that would have driven large numbers of high end taxpayers out of the state. Many were planning to leave, & will now be staying. New York & others should start changing their thought process on taxes, fast!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) July 1, 2019
Starting today, the state’s gas tax doubles from $0.19 to $0.38 cents per gallon. Here's what a gas tax receipt for Chicago motorists would look like if taxes and fees were transparent. #twill pic.twitter.com/LxTDrCrOGT
— Illinois Policy (@illinoispolicy) July 1, 2019
Bipartisan Illinois General Assembly “Leaders” negotiated a deal to DOUBLE your gas tax and increase their pay. I voted HELL NO! We need to cut Illinois taxes, NOT raise them! #twill #UnfairHike https://t.co/RWsfuIJ8UL
— Rep. David McSweeney (@1980reagan) July 1, 2019
No impeachment proceedings.
— Ezra Levin (@ezralevin) July 2, 2019
No opposition to Trump's border bill.
No investigation of Trump rape charges.
No fuss about Trump's tax returns.
There's a clear pattern emerging from Pelosi and House Dem Leadership. https://t.co/v2W4apTn9m
"SALT has been characterized as soaking the rich, but it soaks a lot of other people, too." via
dailydirtnap</a><a href="https://t.co/cV0GwRDCfV">https://t.co/cV0GwRDCfV</a></p>— Bloomberg Tax (
tax) July 1, 2019
(SALT cap zero!)
Americans don't think they're getting tax breaks under Trump, a bad sign for his 2020 prospects https://t.co/dTW9kSaGk2
— Newsweek (@Newsweek) July 1, 2019
Income inequality is on the rise — made worse by the Trump tax cut that was a giant giveaway to the super-wealthy. We’ve got to rebuild the backbone of this country — the middle class.
— Joe Biden (@JoeBiden) July 1, 2019
That starts by rewarding work, not just wealth.
North Carolina Tax Return Preparer Sentenced to Prison for Conspiring to File False Tax Returns https://t.co/TQ6EvqBlQV
— Justice Department (@TheJusticeDept) July 1, 2019
I can’t wait to pay more money for gas and a new license plate in the form of a tax to my favorite for profit organization, the State or Illinois! On top of this list I found of what some of our gas tax money can go to, we also get to pay our politicians a totally fair salary! pic.twitter.com/8iSKgGdhmh
— Benjamin Polo (@bdvpolo) July 1, 2019
Gas taxes…whete they go… pic.twitter.com/U1Yizz5CsO
— Guidoman37 (@guidoman37) July 1, 2019
Related Posts
Taxing Tuesday: Don't Worry, Gamers...plus: Soda Tax Retrospective!
More Soda Tax Idiocy: This Time, It's Seattle
MoneyPalooza Monstrosity! Let's Check Out the State Aid in the $3 Trillion Bill