STUMP » Articles » 80 Percent Funding Hall of Shame: February 2015 Round-up » 2 March 2015, 08:44

Where Stu & MP spout off about everything.

80 Percent Funding Hall of Shame: February 2015 Round-up  

by

2 March 2015, 08:44

My last post for the hall of shame was a few weeks ago, but I figure I might as well clear out the leftover stories from February.

I did either email or leave comments on the stories, so unlike with Hilary Russ, I hope these won’t repeat.

From an Editorial of the Press Enterprise:

The city of Riverside has been able to manage its pension obligations better than many other local governments. Pension funds have generally stayed well above 80 percent, a level cited by the federal Government Accountability Office as a standard for well-funded systems. City officials must be vigilant in ensuring that pension costs are contained.

So yes, they at least named their “experts.”

Here’s that GAO report, btw:

Most state and local government pension plans have enough invested
resources set aside to fund the benefits they are scheduled to pay over the
next several decades. *Many experts consider a funded ratio (actuarial value
of assets divided by actuarial accrued liabilities) of about 80 percent or better
to be sound for government pensions.*

OH WAIT! The GAO didn’t say that 80% is okay. Just that “many experts” consider that sound.

I WANT NAMES.

If nobody is willing to go on record with their name and professional reputation on the line, then I humbly submit this factoid is false.

Next up, Steve Wilson at Mississippi Watchdog:

According to its most recent annual report, the pension system — which serves most state, county and municipal employees — still has $14.4 billion in unfunded liabilities and is still far below the 80 percent funding level, considered a benchmark for a healthy pension fund.

Not even an “experts say” there.

Finally, Michael Dresser at the Baltimore Sun:

Corridor funding had left the pension system severely underfunded, prompting Gov. Martin O’Malley to propose a sweeping reform package that set a goal of achieving by 2023 an 80 percent funding level — generally considered adequate for a public pension plan.

Anyway, nothing particularly new with these approaches.

My 80 percent funding Hall of Shame is up to 21 entries since the end of October 2014.


Related Posts
Pennsylvania Pensions: Nibbling at the Edges
Divestment and Activist Investing Follies: What's Next? My Lunch?
Public Pension Assets: Divestments for Everybody!